Facebook’s EU-US data transfer mechanism ‘cannot be used’ – Cloud

The key system applied by Facebook to transfer facts from the European Union to the United States “simply cannot in practice be applied” for these kinds of transfers, according to Ireland’s Facts Safety Commission, Facebook explained on Wednesday.

The US social media huge explained in a web site publish that it considered the system, Regular Contractual Clauses (SCCs), had been deemed legitimate by the Court docket of Justice of the European Union in July, including:

“We will keep on to transfer facts in compliance with the new CJEU ruling and until eventually we acquire further advice.”

Facebook explained the Irish Facts Safety Commission, Facebook’s lead regulator in the EU, had “commenced an inquiry into Facebook controlled EU-US facts transfers, and has recommended that SCCs simply cannot in practice be applied for EU-US facts transfers”.

The Wall Road Journal reported that the Commission had sent Facebook a preliminary order to suspend transfers to the United States of facts about end users in the European Union.

A spokesman for the Commission declined to comment on the report.

The transatlantic argument stems from EU considerations that the surveillance regime in the United States may perhaps not respect the privateness legal rights of EU citizens when their personal facts is sent to the United States for professional use.

Facebook explained that, although the Commission’s method was matter to further course of action, “if followed, it could have a far reaching influence on firms that rely on SCCs and on the on line products and services numerous persons and firms rely on”.

Europe’s highest courtroom in July ruled that the key transatlantic facts transfer deal hammered out involving Brussels and Washington – Privacy Protect – was invalid because of considerations about US surveillance.

But the judges upheld the validity of the transfer system identified as Regular Contractual Clauses (SCCs).

These are applied by 1000’s of firms to transfer Europeans’ facts around the world for products and services ranging from cloud infrastructure, facts hosting, payroll and finance to marketing and advertising.

Even so, the courtroom pressured that under SCCs, privateness watchdogs must suspend or prohibit transfers outside the EU if facts security in other countries simply cannot be assured.

Austrian privateness activist Max Schrems, who introduced the legal proceedings, explained at the time that this intended firms that drop under US surveillance laws, these kinds of as Facebook, could not use the clauses to shift facts to the United States.

In its publish, Facebook explained that “the rationale in invalidating Privacy Protect has even so developed substantial uncertainty – not just for US tech firms”.

It explained it was location out its place on how to commence with global facts transfers in a European Facts Safety Board taskforce taking into consideration how to utilize the CJEU ruling.

It explained it was also placing “strong safeguards” in location to defend consumer facts, these kinds of as “marketplace typical encryption and safety actions, and detailed insurance policies governing how we reply to legal requests for facts”.

Rosa G. Rose

Next Post

Mi 10T Pro Renders Allegedly Leaked, Tipped to Come in Three Configurations, Four Colour Options

Fri Sep 11 , 2020
Mi 10T Pro is rumoured to be Xiaomi’s approaching smartphone in its Mi ten collection, and a new leak displays alleged renders of the cell phone, alongside with some information and facts on the configurations and color selections. The Mi 10T Pro renders were being shared by a tipster on […]